It appears that the arrangement is a very one-sided one. For while the Imperial Government would, under section 5, practically be credited with the value of all lands or buildings handed over to it in the past by the Colonial Government for military purposes, but no longer required for such, the latter would not be credited with the value of lands which may have been ceded to the Military Department in the interval between the first occupation and the abandonment of the lands no longer required. To make the arrangement seemingly fair, a record should be kept of all lands ceded to the War Department by the Colonial Government, and the value of the same noted. Then, when a piece of land was proposed...
J
AS
have
the arrangement appears
to
be a
very
one
-sided
one,
!
for while the Imperial
Government would, under section 5, practically be credited with the value of
all lands or
buildings
handed over to it in the past by the Colonial Government for Military purposes, but no
longer required for such, the
latter would not be
credited with the value of
lands
lands which
may
been seded to the Military
Department in the interval
between the first occupation, and the abandonment, of
the lands no
a
longer required. To make the arragement
one
d.
seemingly fair record should be kept of
all lands ceded to the War
Department by the Colonial Government, and the value
of
same noted. Then
the same
when a piece of land was
proposed
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.